Paper questions the legality of smart contracts
Smart contracts, like many blockchain-enabled applications, have the potential to transform certain industries by speeding up actions that require multiple signatories and transactions, often across borders.
But a new paper by Washington DC-based lobby group the Chamber of Digital Commerce, questions the legality of such contracts, given the differing legal and regulatory frameworks across multi-jurisdictions.
A smart contract is essentially computer code that, once certain specified conditions are met, can run automatically and be stored on a distributed ledger, and write any resulting changes to that blockchain ledger.
But does it constitute a legal contract? Indeed, can computer code constitute a legal document? And, most importantly for a contract – if it is contested, can its terms be enforced in traditional legal systems?
The paper finds that while most elements of a contract are similar under most legal jurisdictions, the terminology in most is distinct.
However, there are precedents: the paper finds that a blockchain is similar to any other IT-based message platform and courts have already accepted that email messages can constitute legally-binding contracts. Furthermore, automated actions, common in equity market transactions, are also legal.
“Existing contract laws, therefore, in many instances suffice in the case of the formation of smart legal contracts,” says Miren Aparicio, one of the paper’s authors.
The report also raises the issue of enforceability and efforts in the US by individual states to create their own smart contract laws.
It concludes, however, that as more jurisdictions explore the use of smart contracts on blockchain it can be expected that additional issues will be raised where old paradigms must be replaced with new thinking.